Donor conception raises a fundamentally different legal problem from surrogacy, because nobody else gives birth. The intending mother carries and delivers the child, so she is the legal mother under the ordinary rule. What arises instead is the position of the second parent, the status of the donor — and, for a great many families, the question of where treatment took place.
The 2015 Act, and the Gap for Treatment Abroad
The Children and Family Relationships Act 2015 addressed donor-assisted reproduction for treatments meeting its requirements: it provides a route by which the partner of the birth mother can be a legal parent, and confirms that a donor is not a parent and acquires no parental rights or obligations by reason of the donation. Where the framework applies, it works. The difficulty is the boundary. Those provisions apply to treatment carried out in accordance with the Act’s conditions — which is precisely where families whose treatment took place abroad, or before the relevant commencement, or informally without clinical involvement, encounter trouble. This is one of the recognised gaps in Irish law, and the proposed amending legislation has been intended to address it, including by providing a route for people who underwent donor-assisted procedures abroad to have parentage declared here. Until that arrives, the position turns on specifics: where and when treatment took place, what the clinic recorded, whether the donor was traceable or anonymous, and the relationship between the adults. It is worth having assessed rather than assumed, because a striking number of families in this position believe they are covered by the 2015 Act and may not be.
Registers, Origins, and the Same Succession Problem
The framework contemplates records allowing a donor-conceived person to access information about their genetic origins — a National Donor-Conceived Person Register under the 2015 Act framework, and a National Surrogacy Register under the 2024 Act. The policy behind both is the same and is worth understanding rather than resisting: a child’s interest in knowing their origins is treated as significant, which is also why anonymous donation is not the model Irish law favours. The practical implication for parents is that treatment abroad using an anonymous donor may leave a child without access to information they may later want — a decision worth taking consciously rather than by default, and worth thinking about alongside the separate question of what and when you will tell them. Then the point that connects this page to the rest of the site: where a parentage gap exists in a donor-conceived family, the succession consequences are identical to those in surrogacy cases. Intestacy, the construction of wills using undefined words like “my children”, inheritance tax treatment, and the child’s position in an estate all turn on legal parentage rather than on who raised them. That is dealt with properly on the inheritance page, and it is as urgent here as it is there.
Are Both of You Legal Parents? Most Families Have Never Checked.
Where treatment was abroad, informal, or before the relevant provisions, the answer is frequently not what people assume. Establishing it is a single conversation - and keeping the clinic records matters more than anyone expects.
Call 01 5827148